 |
 |

|
 |
 |
 |
Body tinted vs. SOLA
dip tinted (CR-39)
SOLA commissioned independent study to compare Body
Tinted vs. SOLA Dip Tinted:
- COLTS Testing Laboratories
- Dr. Alan Reichow, Pacific University College of
Optometry, Forest Grove, Oregon
SOLA lenses proved to be superior in the following
categories:
- Drop Ball Test (SOLA = 0 failures)
- Abrasion Test (Bayer) (Superior resistance and consistency)
- Tumble Test (Superior resistance and consistency)
- Haze Average (SOLA 4.5 times LESS Haze)
BODY TINTING
Advantages
- Color durability
Disadvantages
- Optical reduced performances: Haze
- Plain color (no gradient)
- Poor coating adhesion
- Reduced impact resistance
|
BATH TINTING
Advantages
- Optical Superior performances: no haze
- Exceptional impact resistance
- Elevated coating adhesion
- Big color variety in plain tint and also gradient,
double gradient, etc.
Disadvantages
- Lower color durability
|
PC Tough Eyes Product Testing Results
PERFORMANCE DATA
|
BAYER
TEST
|
STEEL
WOOL
|
BOIL
ADHESION
|
TOUGH
EYES
|
5.3
|
*****
|
76.7
|
*****
|
*****
|
SOLA
(OLD)
|
2.4
|
***
|
16.9
|
*****
|
*****
|
COMPETITOR
A
|
2.2
|
***
|
0.4
|
*
|
FAIL
|
COMPETITOR
B
|
1.6
|
***
|
0.5
|
*
|
FAIL
|
COMPETITOR
C
|
1.7
|
***
|
0.5
|
*
|
FAIL
|
COMPETITOR
D
|
2.5
|
****
|
1.7
|
***
|
*****
|
Note: Data based on internal testing, May
1998. All ratios are comparisons to uncoated Hard Resin.
|
|
|
|
|
 |